4.6 Article

Bimanual motor skill learning with robotics in chronic stroke: comparison between minimally impaired and moderately impaired patients, and healthy individuals

Journal

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12984-022-01009-3

Keywords

Motor learning; Bimanual; Bimanual coordination; Robotics; Stroke; Neurorehabilitation

Funding

  1. Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique -FNRS [1.R.506.16, 1.R.506.18, 1.R.506.20F]
  2. Fonds Special de Recherche (FSR) from the UCLouvain
  3. Fondation Mont-Godinne
  4. Fonds Special de Recherche (FSR) of the UCLouvain
  5. Fondation Roi Baudouin/Fonds Amelie
  6. PDR-FNRS [T.0239.19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate whether patients with chronic stroke could relearn to coordinate their upper limbs and to compare their motor skill learning with healthy individuals. The findings showed that the patients demonstrated improvements in motor skill learning, although they were less efficient compared to the healthy individuals. The study suggests that motor skill learning may be beneficial for neurorehabilitation after stroke.
Background: Most activities of daily life (ADL) require cooperative bimanual movements. A unilateral stroke may severely impair bimanual ADL. How patients with stroke (re)learn to coordinate their upper limbs (ULs) is largely unknown. The objectives are to determine whether patients with chronic supratentorial stroke could achieve bimanual motor skill learning (bim-MSkL) and to compare bim-MSkL between patients and healthy individuals (His). Methods: Twenty-four patients and ten His trained over 3 consecutive days on an asymmetrical bimanual coordination task (CIRCUIT) implemented as a serious game in the REAplan (R) robot. With a common cursor controlled by coordinated movements of the ULs through robotic handles, they performed as many laps as possible (speed constraint) on the CIRCUIT while keeping the cursor within the track (accuracy constraint). The primary outcome was a bimanual speed/accuracy trade-off (biSAT), we used a bimanual coordination factor (biCO) and bimanual forces (biFOP) for the secondary outcomes. Several clinical scales were used to evaluate motor and cognitive functions. Results: Overall, the patients showed improvements on biSAT and biCO. Based on biSAT progression, the HI achieved a larger bim-MSkL than the patients with mild to moderate impairment (Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE): 28-55, n = 15) but not significantly different from those with minimal motor impairment (FMA-UE: 66, n = 9). There was a significant positive correlation between biSAT evolution and the FMA-UE and Stroke Impact Scale. Conclusions: Both HI and patients with chronic stroke training on a robotic device achieved bim-MSkL, although the more impaired patients were less efficient. Bim-MSkL with REAplan (R) may be interesting for neurorehabilitation after stroke.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available