4.7 Article

Lathyrane and Jatrophane Diterpenoids from Euphorbia helioscopia Evaluated for Cytotoxicity against a Paclitaxel-Resistant A549 Human Lung Cancer Cell Line

Journal

JOURNAL OF NATURAL PRODUCTS
Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages 1174-1179

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.1c01050

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81872768, U1903122]
  2. Shenyang Science and Technology Project (Key Laboratory for TCM Material Basis Study and Innovative Drug Development of Shenyang City)
  3. Program for Liaoning Innovative Talents in University [LR2017043]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A phytochemical investigation of Euphorbia helioscopia yielded 27 macrocyclic diterpenoids, including three previously unreported lathyrane derivatives. Three of these compounds exhibited cytotoxicity against a paclitaxel-resistant lung cancer cell line, but showed no activity against the parent cancer cell line. It was observed that compounds with benzoyloxy or nicotinoyloxy substituents at a specific position displayed enhanced cytotoxic activity.
A phytochemical investigation on the aerial parts of Euphorbia helioscopia resulted in the isolation of 27 macrocyclic diterpenoids, including three previously unreported lathyrane derivatives, euphohelioscopoids A-C (1-3). Their structures were elucidated by spectroscopic data interpretation. Three jatrophanes, euphoscopin C (4), euphorbiapene D (6), and euphoheliosnoid A (5), showed cytotoxicity against a paclitaxel-resistant A549 human lung cancer cell line with IC so values of 6.9, 7.2, and 9.5 mu M, respectively, but were inactive against the parent A549 human lung cancer cell line (IC50 > 10 mu M). It was found that jatrophanes with a benzoyloxy or a nicotinoyloxy substituent at C-7 showed more potent cytotoxic activity than their analogues containing acetyloxy and hydroxy groups at this position.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available