4.4 Article

A Comparison of Seegene Technologies Novaplex SARS-CoV-2 Variants I, II, and IV Assays with Spike Gene Sequencing for Detection of Known Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Variants

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 455-461

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2022.02.001

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo [2019/27803-2]
  2. Sealy and Smith Foundation
  3. NIH [R24 AI120942]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the Novaplex SARS-CoV-2 Variants I, II, and IV assays from Seegene Technologies, which demonstrated good agreement with traditional spike gene Sanger sequencing results, providing an accurate, rapid, and less labor-intensive method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 and identifying known variants of interest and concern.
Tracking new and emerging severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants has become increasingly important for public health responses, primarily because of variant-dependent transmission, disease severity, and treatment decisions. This evaluation compared Seegene Technologies Novaplex SARS-CoV-2 Variants I, II, and IV (I,II&IV) assays to detect known SARS-CoV-2 variants using traditional spike gene Sanger sequencing results as the gold standard reference. Both RNA extraction and extraction-free protocols were assessed. A total of 156 samples were included in this study. There was 100% (109/109) overall agreement (95% CI, 96.7%-100%) between the spike gene sequencing and the I,II&IV results using extracted RNA for the variants included in the Novaplex assay menus. The RNA extraction-free method was 91.7% (143/156) as sensitive (95% CI, 86.2%-95.5%) as the traditional RNA extraction method. Using the extraction-free method on samples with higher cycle threshold values (>30) resulted in some mutations not being detected, presumably due to lower nucleic acid concentrations in the original samples. In conclusion, the I,II&IV assays provide an accurate, rapid, and less labor-intensive method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 and identifying known variants of interest and concern. The RNA extraction-free method for samples with cycle threshold of <30 could be cost-effective for surveillance purposes. However, spike gene sequencing retains the advantage of detecting more and new variants. (J Mol Diagn 2022, 24: 455-461; https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jmoldx.2022.02.001)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available