4.7 Article

Deep learning meets quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) for leveraging structure-based prediction of solute rejection in organic solvent nanofiltration

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 646, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120268

Keywords

Deep learning; Machine learning; Big data; Quantitative structure-activity relationship; Partial least squares regression

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methods for determining solute rejection in organic solvent nanofiltration are time-consuming and expensive. This study presents two prediction methods based on quantitative structure-activity relationship using traditional machine learning and deep learning models, providing a new platform for a more in-depth investigation into membrane-solute interactions.
Methods for determining solute rejection in organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN) are time-consuming and expensive and still rely on wet-lab measurements, resulting in the slow development of membrane processes. OSN, similar to other membrane technologies, requires precise and comprehensive predictive models that can function on various solutes, membranes, and solvents. We present two prediction methods based on the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) using traditional machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models. The partial least-squares regression model combined with the variable importance in projection and genetic algorithm achieves a slightly lower root-mean-square error score (8.04) than the DL-based graph neural network (10.40). For the first time, we visualize the effect of different solute functional groups on rejection, providing a new platform for a more in-depth investigation into the membrane-solute interactions, potentially enabling the design of membranes with improved selectivity. Our ML model is freely accessible on the OSN database website (www.osndatabase.com) for everyone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available