4.2 Article

Maternal peripheral vascular resistance at mid gestation in chronic hypertension as a predictor of fetal growth restriction

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
Volume 35, Issue 25, Pages 9834-9836

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2056443

Keywords

Fetal growth restriction; hemodynamics; peripheral vascular resistance; pregnancy; chronic hypertension

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found a strong relationship between maternal hemodynamics as expressed by PVR at mid gestation and fetal growth at delivery in chronic hypertension. PVR at mid gestation was strongly correlated with birthweight at delivery and the diagnosis of fetal growth restriction. This finding highlights the importance of maternal hemodynamics for identifying chronic hypertensive patients at risk for developing fetal growth restriction.
We aimed at analyzing the relationship between maternal hemodynamics as expressed by Peripheral Vascular Resistance (PVR) at mid gestation and fetal growth at delivery in chronic hypertension. 152 chronic hypertensive patients were submitted to echocardiography noting PVR at 22-24 weeks' gestation and were followed until delivery noting birthweight centile and the diagnosis of fetal growth restriction (FGR). The logarithmic correlation analysis showed that PVR at mid gestation was strongly related to birthweight at delivery (r = -0.72; p < .001). Moreover, PVR was predictive of both a birthweight <10th centile (PVR >1466 Sensitivity 75.0%, Specificity 93.4%, AUC 0.83, p < .001) and FGR (PVR > 1355 Sensitivity 84.2%, Specificity 93.2%, AUC 0.88, p < .001). This study highlights the importance of maternal hemodynamics as expressed by PVR at mid gestation for the identification of chronic hypertensive patients at risk for developing fetal growth restriction. This observation might open new areas of intervention to treat patients with altered hemodynamics (PVR > 1355 dyne s cm(-5)).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available