4.7 Article

Observation of magnetic domain evolution in constrained epitaxial Ni-Mn-Ga thin films on MgO(001) substrate

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages 56-65

Publisher

JOURNAL MATER SCI TECHNOL
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.06.029

Keywords

Ni-Mn-Ga thin films; Magnetic field-induced variant reorientation; Magnetic domains; Magnetization process; Magneto-optical Kerr microscopy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foun-dation of China [52071071]
  2. Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program [XLYC1802023]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [N2102006]
  4. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline Innovation to Universities 2.0 (the 111 Project of China 2.0) [BP0719037]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the magnetic domain and microstructure evolution of epitaxial Ni-Mn-Ga thin films were investigated using wide-field magneto-optical Kerr microscopy. The results showed that the abrupt magnetization changes in the hysteresis loops should be attributed to the magnetic domain evolution.
Epitaxial Ni-Mn-Ga thin films have promising application potential in micro-electro-mechanical sensing and actuation systems. To date, large abrupt magnetization changes have been observed in some epitaxial Ni-Mn-Ga thin films, but their origin either from magnetically induced martensite variant reorientation (MIR) or magnetic domain evolution has been discussed controversially. In the present work, we investigated the evolutions of the magnetic domain and microstructure of a typical epitaxial Ni-Mn-Ga thin film through wide-field magneto-optical Kerr-microscopy. It is demonstrated that the abrupt magnetization changes in the hysteresis loops should be attributed to the magnetic domain evolution instead of the MIR. (c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The editorial office of Journal of Materials Science & Technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available