4.5 Article

Effects of Magnetic Field on the Corrosion Reactions of A572 Steel in NaCl Aqueous Solution

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND PERFORMANCE
Volume 31, Issue 11, Pages 9294-9302

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-022-06920-3

Keywords

A572 steel; electrochemical test; immersion test; magnetic field; x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

Funding

  1. Virginia Tech National Center for Earth and Environmental Nanotechnology Infrastructure (NanoEarth) - NSF [ECCS 1542100, ECCS 2025151]
  2. Virgin Hyperloop

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of magnetic field on the corrosion behaviors of A572 steel were investigated in 0.6 M sodium chloride solution. The results showed that the weight loss of A572 steel decreased and the corrosion potential increased while the corrosion current density decreased under the applied magnetic field. Analysis also confirmed the effective inhibition of anodic metal dissolution by the magnetic field.
The effects of magnetic field on the corrosion behaviors of A572 steel were studied by electrochemical and immersion tests in 0.6 M sodium chloride aqueous solution at room temperature. A magnetic field of 2-15 mT was applied in the normal direction of the specimen during the corrosion tests. Post-corrosion characterization was performed by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Specifically, it was found that the weight loss of A572 steel decreased by similar to 81% under a magnetic field of 15 mT after the immersion test of 35 days. Potentiodynamic and potentiostatic test results showed an increase in corrosion potential and a reduction of corrosion current density when magnetic field was applied, accompanied by the formation of fewer pits on the surface. Depth-profiling XPS analysis indicated a significant reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+ ratio on the corroded surface when magnetic field was applied, confirming its effective inhibition of anodic metal dissolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available