4.5 Article

Magnetization reversal asymmetry in a structured ferromagnetic nanoparticle with varying shape anisotropy

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168929

Keywords

Pseudo-exchange bias; Micromagnetic simulation; Hysteresis loops; Magnetic nanostructure; Tessellation

Funding

  1. Silesian University of Technology Rector's Grant [14/030/RGJ21/00110]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Asymmetric hysteresis loops can be observed in exchange-bias systems and in purely ferromagnetic samples due to minor loops or thermal effects. Micromagnetic simulations of a nanoparticle structure reveal distinctly asymmetric and horizontally shifted hysteresis loops.
Asymmetric hysteresis loops can be found in exchange-bias systems in which a ferromagnet is exchange-coupled with an antiferromagnet. In purely ferromagnetic samples, such effects can occur due to undetected minor loops or thermal effects. While the exchange bias is long established in hard-disk read/write heads and diverse spintronics applications, minor loops are sometimes used for the calculation of first order reversal curves (FORCs). Reports about their technological relevance, however, are scarce. Here we report on micromagnetic simulations of a nanoparticle with areas of varying height, consisting of tessellations of a defined area, in which the shape anisotropy in narrow higher lines opposes magnetization reversal stronger than in the larger, lower areas between, thus interacting similar to hard/soft magnetic materials although consisting of the same material and thus having identical magneto-crystalline anisotropy. After saturating this nanostructure by a strong magnetic field pulse, distinctly asymmetric, horizontally shifted hysteresis loops can be recognized, especially in the transverse magnetization component. We show the influence of the external magnetic field orientation on this asymmetry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available