4.7 Article

Accelerated Pancreatobiliary MRI for Pancreatic Cancer Surveillance in Patients With Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages 1757-1768

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28189

Keywords

pancreas; MRI; intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm; surveillance; MRCP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to establish an accelerated MRI protocol for pancreatic cancer surveillance and evaluate its performance in lesion characterization. 30 participants underwent the protocol, and the results showed that accelerated MRI had similar diagnostic performance to CECT and higher diagnostic confidence.
Background Pancreatobiliary MRI is often recommended for patients at risk of developing pancreas cancer. But the surveillance MRI protocol has not yet been widely accepted. Purpose To establish an accelerated MRI protocol targeting the table time of 15 minutes for pancreatic cancer surveillance and test its performance in lesion characterization. Study type Prospective. Population A total of 30 participants were enrolled, who were undergoing follow-up care for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms or newly diagnosed pancreatic cysts (>= 10 mm) and were scheduled for or had recently undergone contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). Field strength/sequence A 3 T; heavily T2WI, 3D MRCP, DWI, dynamic T1WI, two-point Dixon. Assessment In-room time and table time were measured. Seven radiologists independently reviewed image quality of MRI and then the presence of high-risk stigmata and worrisome features in addition to diagnostic confidence for accelerated MRI, CECT, and the noncontrast part of accelerated MRI (NC-MRI). Statistical analysis Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables and either the Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney test was performed for continuous variables. The generalized estimated equation was used to compare the diagnostic performance of examinations on a per-patient basis. Interobserver agreement was evaluated via Fleiss kappa. A P value of The in-room time was 18.5 +/- 2.6 minutes (range: 13.7-24.9) and the table time was 13.9 +/- 1.9 minutes (range: 10.7-17.5). There was no significant difference between the diagnostic performances of the three examinations (pooled sensitivity: 75% for accelerated MRI and CECT, 68% for NC-MRI, P = 0.95), with the highest significant diagnostic confidence for accelerated MRI (4.2 +/- 0.1). With accelerated MRI, the interobserver agreement was fair to excellent for high-risk stigmata (kappa = 0.34-0.98). Data Conclusion Accelerated MRI protocol affords a table time of 15 minutes, making it potentially suitable for cancer surveillance in patients at risk of developing pancreatic cancer. Evidence level 2 Technical efficacy stage 2

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available