4.4 Article

Revisiting the Schrage Equation for Kinetically Limited Evaporation and Condensation

Journal

Publisher

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4054382

Keywords

Schrage equation; evaporation; condensation; accommodation coefficient; kinetic theory; Knudsen layer; moment method; Hertz-Knudsen equation; evaporation coefficient; condensation coefficient; Boltzmann transport equation; liquid-vapor phase change; polyatomic vapor

Funding

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA955019-1-0392, 10.13039/100000181]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The accuracy of the Schrage equation for high-rate liquid-vapor phase change is evaluated in this paper, and it is found that the equation may have significant deviations in certain cases. The moment method equations are recommended as an alternative to the Schrage equation.
The Schrage equation is commonly used in thermofluid engineering to model high-rate liquid-vapor phase change of pure fluids. Although shortcomings of this simple model were pointed out decades ago and more rigorous models have emerged from the kinetic theory community, Schrage's equation continues to be widely used. In this paper, we quantify the accuracy of the Schrage equation for evaporation and condensation of monatomic and polyatomic fluids at the low to moderately high flux operating conditions relevant to thermofluid engineering applications. As a high-accuracy reference, we numerically solve a Bhatnagar, Gross, and Krook (BGK)-like a model equation for polyatomic vapors that have previously been shown to produce accurate solutions to the Boltzmann transport equation. We observe that the Schrage equation overpredicts heat/ mass fluxes by similar to 15% for fluids with accommodation coefficients close to unity. For fluids with smaller accommodation coefficients, such as water, the Schrage equation yields more accurate flux estimates. We find that the Mott-Smith-like moment methods developed for liquid-vapor phase change are much more accurate than the Schrage equation, achieving heat/mass flux estimates that deviate by less than 1% (evaporation) and 4% (condensation)from the reference solution. In light of these results, we recommend using the moment method equations instead of the Schrage equation. We also provide tables with our high-accuracy numerical data for evaporation of any fluid and condensation of saturated water vapor, engineering equations fit our data, and code for moment method calculations of evaporation and condensation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available