4.7 Article

Acidity-dependent mobilization of antimony and arsenic in sediments near a mining area

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 426, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127790

Keywords

mining sediment; leaching; GANC; MINTEQ simulation; iron mineral

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41877378, 41425016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the mobility of antimony (Sb) and arsenic (As) in sediments near mining areas and identified the factors controlling their mobilization. The results showed that the leachability of Sb and As exhibited a V-shape pattern, with the lowest concentration observed at an acidity of 1.6 eq H+/kg. The study also predicted that Sb and As would be immobilized in sediments when the acidity accumulated to 1.6 eq H+/kg for a long term.
Coexisting antimony (Sb) and arsenic (As) have raised worldwide concerns, but the factors controlling the mobilization of Sb and As in sediments near mining areas are not fully understood. Herein, multiple leaching methods and complementary spectroscopic analyses were used to investigate the mobility of Sb and As and its controlling factors in sediments around the Xikuangshan tailings pond over a wide range of acidity. The general acid neutralizing capacity (GANC) test showed that the leachability of Sb and As exhibited a V-shape pattern with a minimum concentration at 1.6 eq H+/kg. The result of MINTEQ simulation agreed well with our GANC results, and demonstrated that the decrease of Sb and As in the range 0-1.6 eq H+/kg and the increase in 1.6-4 eq H+/kg were mainly controlled by the adsorption and dissolution of iron oxyhydroxide, respectively. Based on the Vshaped leaching trend, Sb and As were predicted to be immobilized in sediments when the acidity accumulated to 1.6 eq H+/kg for a long term up to 61 years. This study provides insights in assessing the leaching risks and predicting the mobilization of Sb and As in sediments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available