4.7 Article

Deciphering the extracellular and intracellular antibiotic resistance genes in multiple environments reveals the persistence of extracellular ones

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 429, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128275

Keywords

Extracellular antibiotic resistance genes; (eARGs); Intracellular ARGs (iARGs); Mobile genetic elements (MGEs); Diversity; Genetic context; Metagenomic sequencing

Funding

  1. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment of China [2017ZX07202]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41773082, 41573065, 21337001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study systematically analyzed the extracellular and intracellular antibiotic resistance genes in different environments and found that their diversities, relative abundances, and compositions were similar. However, the correlation between extracellular integrons/ISs and ARGs was lower. The gene cassette and identified ARGs were different between extracellular and intracellular samples. Most ARGs were located on chromosomes, but the proportion of extracellular ARGs carried by plasmids increased.
The extracellular and intracellular antibiotic resistance genes (eARGs and iARGs) together constitute the entire resistome in environments. However, the systematic analysis of eARGs and iARGs was still inadequate. Three kinds of environments, i.e., livestock manure, sewage sludge, and lake sediment, were analyzed to reveal the comprehensive characteristics of eARGs and iARGs. Based on the metagenomic data, the diversities, relative abundances, and compositions of eARGs and iARGs were similar. The extracellular and intracellular integrons and insertion sequences (ISs) also did not show any significant differences. However, the degree and significance of the correlation between total relative abundances of integrons/ISs and ARGs were lower outside than inside the cells. Gene cassettes carried by class 1 integron were amplified in manure and sludge samples, and sequencing results showed that the identified ARGs extracellularly and intracellularly were distinct. By analyzing the genetic contexts, most ARGs were found located on chromosomes. Nevertheless, the proportion of ARGs carried by plasmids increased extracellularly. qPCR was employed to quantify the absolute abundances of sul1, sul2, tetO, and tetW, and their extracellular proportions were found highest in sludge samples. These findings together raised the requirements of considering eARGs and iARGs separately in terms of risk evaluation and removal management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available