4.7 Review

Gas sensing based on metal-organic frameworks: Concepts, functions, and developments

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 429, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128321

Keywords

Gas sensors; Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs); Monitoring techniques; Adsorption

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21922601, 22106015]
  2. LiaoNing Revitali-zation Talents Program [XLYC1807080]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT20YG123]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews the fundamental aspects and applications of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) in gas sensors, and discusses various techniques of monitoring gases using MOFs as functional materials. Insights and perspectives for further challenges faced by MOFs are also discussed.
Effective detection of pollutant gases is vital for protection of natural environment and human health. There is an increasing demand for sensing devices that are equipped with high sensitivity, fast response/recovery speed, and remarkable selectivity. Particularly, attention is given to the designability of sensing materials with porous structures. Among diverse kinds of porous materials, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) exhibit high porosity, high degree of crystallinity and exceptional chemical activity. Their strong host-guest interactions with guest molecules facilitate the application of MOFs in adsorption, catalysis and sensing systems. In particular, the tailorable framework/composition and potential for post-synthetic modification of MOFs endow them with widely promising application in gas sensing devices. In this review, we outlined the fundamental aspects and applications of MOFs for gas sensors, and discussed various techniques of monitoring gases based on MOFs as functional materials. Insights and perspectives for further challenges faced by MOFs are discussed in the end.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available