4.7 Article

Supercritical CO2 assisted process for the production of mixed phospholipid nanoliposomes: Unloaded and vitamin D3-loaded vesicles

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
Volume 316, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2021.110851

Keywords

Cholecalciferol; Supercritical CO2; Lipid carriers; Nanoencapsulation; Hydrogenated phospholipids

Funding

  1. FAPESP (Sao Paulo State Research Foundation, Brazil) [2017/10954-2, 2019/08345-3]
  2. University of Salerno

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, SuperLip technology was used to produce unloaded and VD3-loaded nanoliposomes. The results showed that both unloaded and VD3-loaded liposomes presented a unimodal size distribution at a water flow rate of 10 mL/min, with the latter having slightly larger diameters. Addition of purified phospholipids led to an increase in the mean size and encapsulation efficiency of VD3-loaded liposomes.
In this study, SuperLip, an innovative technology assisted by supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2), was used to produce unloaded and vitamin D-3 (VD3)-loaded nanoliposomes. Vesicles were produced using hydrogenated and nonhydrogenated phosphatidylcholine from food-grade lecithins at ratios of 30:70, 20:80 and 0:100. SuperLip was operated at 100 bar and 40 degrees C using water flow rates ranging from 2.5 to 10 mL/min. The results showed that unloaded liposomes produced by SuperLip presented a unimodal size distribution at a water flow rate of 10 mL/min, regardless of the phospholipid ratio, and mean diameters ranging from 125 to 141 nm. VD3-loaded liposomes also presented a unimodal size distribution at this water flow rate, but slightly higher diameters that ranged from 144 to 252 nm. Furthermore, the addition of 20% purified phospholipids to liposomes led to an increase in the mean size of VD3-loaded vesicles from 144 to 218 nm and an increase in the encapsulation efficiency from 66.7 to 88.9%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available