4.6 Article

Influence of different fermentation conditions on the analytical and sensory properties of craft beers: Hopping, fermentation temperature and yeast strain

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2021.104278

Keywords

Craft beers; Dry hopping; Volatile compounds; Phenolic compounds; Sensory analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of the hopping method, fermentation temperature, and yeast strain on the physical-chemical characteristics, phenolic content, volatile compounds, and sensory profile of beers was studied. Hopping method had a greater influence, while temperature and yeast strain had less impact. Dry hopping produced less polyphenol-rich beers and resulted in more floral and fruity flavors compared to boiling stage hopping.
The influence of the hopping method (boiling stage hopping or dry hopping), the fermentation temperature (12 and 18 degrees C), and the yeast strain (five different yeasts) on the physical-chemical characteristics (bitterness, color, alcohol content), the phenolic content, the volatile compounds, as well as the sensory profile of beers, has been studied. The hopping method was much more influential than temperature and yeast strain, however, its influence on volatile content clearly depended on the fermentation temperature, with a higher content of volatile compounds, when a higher fermentation temperature was employed. For phenolic compounds, dry hopping produced less polyphenol-rich beers, regardless of the fermentation temperature. Sensorily, it resulted in more floral and fruity beers than those produced by boiling stage hopping, which exhibited a more intense toasted aroma. Concerning yeast strain, no relationship could be established between the type of commercial yeast (bottom or top-fermenting) and the resulting volatile content.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available