4.5 Article

Establishment and evaluation of qPCR and real-time recombinase-aided amplification assays for detection of largemouth bass ranavirus

Journal

JOURNAL OF FISH DISEASES
Volume 45, Issue 7, Pages 1033-1043

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfd.13627

Keywords

largemouth bass ranavirus; qPCR; recombinase aided amplification; sensitivity; specificity

Funding

  1. Guangdong Provincial Special Fund for Modern Agriculture Industry Technology Innovation Teams [2021KJ119]
  2. Guangxi project of key research and development (GuikeAB) [21220017]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China Regional Science Foundation Project [32160873]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2019MC036]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A qPCR and real-time RAA assay were established for the detection of LMBV, with qPCR more suitable for quantitative analysis in the laboratory and real-time RAA more suitable as a point-of-care diagnostic tool for on-site detection and screening of LMBV under farm conditions.
Largemouth bass ranavirus disease (LMBVD) caused by largemouth bass ranavirus (LMBV) has resulted in severe economic losses in the largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) farming industry in China. Early and accurate diagnosis is the key measure for the prevention and control of LMBVD. In this study, a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and a real-time recombinase-aided amplification (real-time RAA) assay were established for the detection of LMBV. The sensitivity and specificity of these two methods, and the efficacy for detection of LMBV from clinical samples were also evaluated. Results showed that the real-time RAA reaction was completed in <30 min at 39celcius with a detection limit of 58.3 copies, while qPCR reaction required 60 min with a detection limit of 5.8 copies. Both methods were specific for LMBV, where no cross-reactions observed with the other tested fish pathogens. Comparing the amplification results of both assays to the results obtained by virus isolation using 53 clinical tissue samples, results showed that the clinical sensitivity of real-time RAA and qPCR were 93.75% and 100% respectively, and the clinical specificity of both were 100%. Our results showed that qPCR is more suitable for quantitative analysis and accurate detection of LMBV in the laboratory, while real-time RAA is more suitable as a point-of-care diagnostic tool for on-site detection and screening of LMBV under farm conditions and in poorly equipped laboratories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available