4.7 Article

Effect of precipitates on mechanical properties of AA2195

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 669, Issue -, Pages 187-198

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.01.229

Keywords

Precipitation; Aging; AA2195; Aluminum; Mechanical properties

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0018478] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Addition of 1-4 wt.% lithium into a conventional Al-Cu-Mg alloy allows lower density and higher mechanical properties, which are attractive for aerospace applications. In this study, fundamental investigations including phase and microstructure evolution, resulting in strengthening, of the AA2195 are conducted to observe a possibility of production with commercial level. Precipitation sequence and kinetics during post-annealing were evaluated with variations of temperature and holding time. Microstructures revealed formation and evolution in representative precipitates including theta (Al2Cu), beta' (Al3Zr), and T (AlxLiyCu) series. Aluminum alloys have low hardness, modulus, and strength before aging, but precipitates such as theta' (Al2Cu), beta' (Al3Zr), and T-1 (Al2LiCu) show enhanced mechanical properties of AA2195 tempered because of their interaction with dislocation. However, longer holding time and higher annealing temperature result in significant decreases in mechanical properties due to the presence of incoherent precipitates (q phase) and coarsening of the precipitates via grain-boundary diffusion. In the current study, the tensile strength of 560 MPa was obtained with post-heat treatment without work hardening. This value has never been achieved in other studies. The maximum strength was reported as 500 MPa without a work hardening process. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available