4.7 Article

Interdiffusion in fcc Ni-X (X = Rh, Ta, W, Re and Ir) alloys

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 657, Issue -, Pages 457-463

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.10.120

Keywords

Nickel based superalloys; Interdiffusion; Diffusion coefficient; Diffusion couple; Transition element

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation for Youth of China [51301208]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51474239, 51429101]
  3. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation for Youth of China [2015JJ3146]
  4. Shenghua Scholar Program of Central South University, Changsha, China
  5. State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy Foundation, Central South University, Changsha, China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interdiffusion coefficients in binary face-centered cubic (fcc) NieX (X = Rh, Ta, W, Re and Ir) alloys at 1473, 1523, 1573 and 1623 K were measured by using semi-infinite diffusion couples together with the Sauer-Freise method. A scientific method was employed to evaluate the errors of the determined interdiffusivities by considering the error propagation. The measured interdiffusion coefficients agree in general with the literature data. In order to find out the possible substitutional element for Re in Ni-based superalloys, a comprehensive comparison among the interdiffusion coefficients in fcc NieX (X = Nb, Mo, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ta, W, Re, Os, Ir and Pt) alloys with 6 wt% X at 1473-1623 K was conducted. The comparison results indicate that fcc Ni-6 wt% Os alloys exhibit the lowest diffusion coefficient, followed by Ni-6 wt% Re and Ni-6 wt% Ir alloys. The further analysis on the variation of interdiffusion coefficient with its influence factors including alloying concentration, temperature, atomic number, activation energy, atomic radius and compressibility was also performed. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available