4.5 Article

Glass at risk: A new approach for the study of 19th century vessel glass

Journal

JOURNAL OF CULTURAL HERITAGE
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages 155-166

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2022.01.013

Keywords

Potash glass; Lead crystal; Glass deterioration; XRF; FORS; OCT

Funding

  1. National Endowment for the Humanities [PR-253388-17]
  2. National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) [PR-253388-17] Funding Source: National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a novel multi-modal approach for the technical study of vessel glass using a group of rare musical instruments. Several non-invasive techniques, including optical microscopy, spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction, are utilized to characterize the current condition issues of these instruments. The combination of these methods contributes to improved analysis capabilities and reveals the newly uncovered story of these remarkable objects.
This paper describes a novel multi-modal approach to the technical study of vessel glass based on a group of rare musical instruments: glass flutes and piccolos made by Claude Laurent and his workshop in Paris in the first half of the 19th century. Current condition issues that plague many of these instruments are characterized by a suite of complementary, non-invasive techniques, including optical microscopy, X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, visible-near infrared-shortwave infrared fiber optic spectroscopy, optical coherence tomography, and UV fluorescence spectroscopy. Microsamples of surface particles on the glass surfaces are also analyzed by Raman spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. This combined methodology contributes to improved capabilities for analysis of historical vessel glass deterioration, as well as to the newly uncovered story of these remarkable objects.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available