4.5 Article

Old buildings need new ideas: Holistic integration of conservation-restoration process data using Heritage Building Information Modelling

Journal

JOURNAL OF CULTURAL HERITAGE
Volume 55, Issue -, Pages 30-42

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2022.02.005

Keywords

Heritage Building Information Modelling (HBIM); Conservation plan; Digitisation; Revitalization

Funding

  1. European Commission under the Horizon2020 Widespread-Teaming program [739574]
  2. Slovenian Research Agency [P2-0273]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Utilizing BIM workflows can improve the efficiency of preserving and restoring cultural heritage, while a comprehensive information management approach can better protect heritage and make conservation plans more accessible to stakeholders.
The preservation of cultural heritage and the renovation, restoration and remodelling processes could benefit greatly from Building Information Modelling (BIM) workflows being established. Currently, experts are involved with fractionated workflows, where a lot of data are missing, become lost or are duplicated by different stakeholders. All the resulting confusion severely impacts on the preservation of heritage as well as the efficiency of its restoring/remodelling/revitalizing from the point of view of current needs. Heritage information is usually conveyed through conservation-restoration plans and guidelines In this research, a new methodology for managing the information holistically integrated into the BIM is proposed. The workflow is showcased on a demo-case building that is protected as cultural heritage. Consequently, the conservation plan becomes more accessible, not only for stakeholders in heritage, but also stakeholders responsible for the renovation, such as architects and contractors. This can result in an improved understanding of the heritage and a better revitalization. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available