4.6 Article

Primordial black hole formation with full numerical relativity

Journal

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/03/029

Keywords

gravity; primordial black holes; physics of the early universe

Funding

  1. Leibnitz Supercomputing Centre SuperMUC-NG under PRACE grant [2018194669]
  2. Julich Supercomputing Center JUWELS HPC under PRACE grant [2020225359]
  3. COSMA7 in Durham and Leicester DiAL HPC under DiRAC RAC13 Grant [ACTP238]
  4. BEIS capital funding via STFC capital [ST/P002307/1, ST/R002452/1]
  5. STFC [ST/R00689X/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the formation of black holes from subhorizon and superhorizon perturbations in a matter dominated universe is investigated using numerical relativity simulations. Two primary mechanisms of formation are identified, depending on the initial perturbation's mass and geometry. The findings contribute to a better understanding of the formation mechanisms of black holes.
We study the formation of black holes from subhorizon and superhorizon perturbations in a matter dominated universe with 3+1D numerical relativity simulations. We find that there are two primary mechanisms of formation depending on the initial perturbation's mass and geometry via direct collapse of the initial overdensity and via post-collapse accretion of the ambient dark matter. In particular, for the latter case, the initial perturbation does not have to satisfy the hoop conjecture for a black hole to form. In both cases, the duration of the formation the process is around a Hubble time, and the initial mass of the black hole is M-BH similar to 10(-2) (H-1MPI2). Post formation, we find that the PBH undergoes rapid mass growth beyond the self-similar limit M-BH proportional to H-1 at least initially. We argue that this implies that most of the final mass of the PBH is accreted from its ambient surroundings post formation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available