4.7 Article

An efficient four-way coupled lattice Boltzmann - discrete element method for fully resolved simulations of particle-laden flows

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
Volume 453, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2022.110942

Keywords

Direct numerical simulation; Particle-laden flow; Lattice Boltzmann method; Discrete element method; Lubrication hydrodynamics; Contact modeling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A four-way coupling scheme for particle-laden flows is developed and analyzed, with a focus on parameter selection and calibration. The scheme is validated through several tests of increasing physical complexity, providing a systematic methodology for future developments.
A four way coupling scheme for the direct numerical simulation of particle-laden flows is developed and analyzed. It employs a multiple-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann method with an adapted bulk viscosity to simulate the fluid phase efficiently. The momentum exchange method is used to couple the fluid and the particulate phase. The particle interactions in normal and tangential direction are accounted for by a discrete element method using linear contact forces. All parameters of the scheme are studied and evaluated in detail and precise guidelines for their choice are developed. The development is based on several carefully selected calibration and validation tests of increasing physical complexity. It is found that a well-calibrated lubrication model is crucial to obtain the correct trajectories of a sphere colliding with a plane wall in a viscous fluid. For adequately resolving the collision dynamics it is found that the collision time must be stretched appropriately. The complete set of tests establishes a validation pipeline that can be universally applied to other fluid-particle coupling schemes providing a systematic methodology that can guide future developments. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available