4.7 Article

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction update-2016

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 138, Issue 5, Pages 1292-+

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.05.029

Keywords

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction; exercise-induced bronchospasm; exercise-induced asthma; exercise-induced bronchoconstriction pathogenesis; diagnosis; differential diagnosis and therapy; nonpharmacologic; pharmacologic

Funding

  1. TEVA
  2. GlaxoSmithKline
  3. AstraZeneca
  4. Merck
  5. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  6. Amgen
  7. Genentech/Novartis
  8. Circassia
  9. Meda
  10. Mylan
  11. Sanofi
  12. Sunovion
  13. Bausch Lomb
  14. Johnson Johnson
  15. Novartis
  16. Pearl Therapeutics
  17. Genentech
  18. Pfizer
  19. Allergy Therapeutics
  20. Alcon
  21. Agency for Healthcare Research Quality [1K08HS024599-01]
  22. American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology
  23. Reach MD
  24. Thermo Fisher Scientific
  25. California Society for Allergy and Immunology
  26. Allergy and Asthma Network
  27. New England Society for Allergy
  28. UCLA/Harbor Heiner Lectureship
  29. Medscape
  30. Western Michigan School of Medicine
  31. Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
  32. Pennsylvania Society for Allergy and Immunology
  33. NIH
  34. Quintiles
  35. PRA
  36. UpToDate
  37. Annals of Allergy
  38. Pulmonary & Allergy Associates Atlantic Health System
  39. Thermo Fisher
  40. NIAID
  41. Astellas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The first practice parameter on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) was published in 2010. This updated practice parameter was prepared 5 years later. In the ensuing years, there has been increased understanding of the pathogenesis of EIB and improved diagnosis of this disorder by using objective testing. At the time of this publication, observations included the following: dry powder mannitol for inhalation as a bronchial provocation test is FDA approved however not currently available in the United States; if baseline pulmonary function test results are normal to near normal (before and after bronchodilator) in a person with suspected EIB, then further testing should be performed by using standardized exercise challenge or eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH); and the efficacy of nonpharmaceutical interventions (omega-3 fatty acids) has been challenged. The workgroup preparing this practice parameter updated contemporary practice guidelines based on a current systematic literature review. The group obtained supplementary literature and consensus expert opinions when the published literature was insufficient. A search of the medical literature on PubMed was conducted, and search terms included pathogenesis, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and therapy (both pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical) of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction or exercise-induced asthma (which is no longer a preferred term); asthma; and exercise and asthma. References assessed as relevant to the topic were evaluated to search for additional relevant references. Published clinical studies were appraised by category of evidence and used to document the strength of the recommendation. The parameter was then evaluated by Joint Task Force reviewers and then by reviewers assigned by the parent organizations, as well as the general membership. Based on this process, the parameter can be characterized as an evidence-and consensus-based document.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available