4.7 Article

A generalized Jaeger J(0, 1; t) integral, resulting from mathematical modelling in electroanalytical chemistry

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2022.114090

Keywords

Bessel functions; Contour integration; Laplace transform; Potential step chronoamperometry; Cylindrical microelectrodes; Computational electrochemistry

Funding

  1. PLGrid Infrastructure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study discusses the application of Jaeger integrals in various physical phenomena and introduces a new integral that can be perceived as a generalization of the J(0,1;t) integral. The paper also presents a method to compute this integral with high precision using standard floating point variables.
Eighty years ago J.C. Jaeger et al. introduced a class of improper integrals, currently called Jaeger integrals that occur in theoretical models of diverse physical phenomena characterized by cylindrical geometry. One application area is electroanalytical chemistry, where, in particular, the limiting Faradaic current in a potential step chronoamperometric experiment at a cylindrical electrode is described by the Jaeger J(0, 1; t) integral. In a recently published paper the first author determined the Laplace transform of the nonlimiting Faradaic current for a reversible charge transfer between members of a redox couple characterized by different diffusion coefficients. In this study we invert the novel Laplace transform and observe that, while it cannot be expressed by any of the Jaeger integrals, it can be perceived as a generalization of the J(0, 1; t) integral. We also describe how to compute this integral with the modulus of the relative error close to 10(-16) or smaller, using a C++ code employing exclusively standard floating point variables, without resorting to quad precision or other external high precision libraries. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available