4.6 Review

Effectiveness of surgical root coverage on dentin hypersensitivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 8, Pages 840-851

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13664

Keywords

dentin sensitivity; gingival recession; meta-analysis; systematic review; tooth root

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surgical root coverage has a significant effect on suppressing dentin hypersensitivity associated with gingival recession.
Aim To assess the effect of surgical root coverage (RC) on dentin hypersensitivity (DH) associated with gingival recession. Materials and Methods Two independent reviewers conducted electronic literature searches in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web Of Science, Dentistry & Oral Sciences Source, ScienceDirect, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases as well as a manual search to identify eligible clinical studies from January 2000 to March 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two surgical RC techniques or a surgical RC technique with or without adjuvant were included. Meta-analyses were performed on data provided by RCTs. Results Thirteen RCTs with a total of 701 patients (1086 recessions) were included. The percentage of DH suppression was 70.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] [64.4-76.6]; I-2 = 39.2% [3.5-61.8], Q-test = 0.02) after surgical RC. Recession reduction and percentage of RC were both statistically significantly associated with DH suppression (estimate = 0.66 [0.10-1.23], p = .022, R-2 = 14.45% and estimate = 0.04 [0.01-0.08], p = .012, R-2 = 29.54%, respectively). Coronally advanced flap (CAF) + connective tissue graft showed results statistically more effective than CAF + xenogeneic collagen matrix in DH suppression (73.3% [65.6-79.8] and 61.4% [51.7-70.3], respectively; p = .048). Conclusions Success of surgical RC is associated with DH suppression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available