4.4 Review

Efficacy, Feasibility, and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages E283-E292

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001680

Keywords

endosonography; fine-needle biopsy; subepithelial; gastrointestinal; diagnosis

Funding

  1. Research Incubation Project of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University [KY08025]
  2. Basic Research and Frontier Exploration Project of Yuzhong District of Chongqing [20190107]
  3. Chongqing Talent Plan [cstc2021ycjhbgzxm0077]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study systematically evaluated the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of EUS-FNB in diagnosing GI SELs, and concluded that EUS-FNB has relatively high diagnostic yield, technical success, and security.
Background: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) fine-needle biopsy (FNB) has become an efficient method for diagnosing gastrointestinal (GI) subepithelial lesions (SELs). However, recent guidelines have not regarded FNB as the primary strategy for diagnosing GI SELs. We performed this study to systematically measure the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of EUS-FNB in diagnosing GI SELs. Materials and Methods: Relevant studies were searched in PubMed and EMBASE and published after January 2015 were included. The overall rates of diagnostic yield, technical success, and adverse events were calculated as outcome measures. The Jadad scale and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to evaluate the quality of the trials, funnel plots and Egger's test were used to measure publication bias, and sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to explore the variance of heterogeneity and sensitivity, respectively. Results: Sixteen studies analyzing 969 patients between 2015 and 2020 were included. Studies showed little change in sensitivity, and 13 were considered high quality. A certain degree of publication bias existed in the diagnostic accuracy rate. The overall rates of diagnostic yield, technical success, and adverse events were [85.69% (95% confidence interval (CI): 82.73-88.22, I (2)=41.8%), 98.83% (95% CI: 96.73-99.97, I (2)=54.3%), and 1.26% (95% CI: 0.35-2.54, I (2)=0.0%)]. No clinical influencing factors were identified in the subgroup analysis. Conclusions: EUS-FNB is a promising technology with a relatively superior diagnostic yield, technical success, and security, which is an optimal option for the diagnosis of SELs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available