4.7 Article

Repeat Bone Mineral Density Screening Measurement and Fracture Prediction in Older Men: A Prospective Cohort Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Volume 107, Issue 9, Pages E3877-E3886

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgac324

Keywords

bone mineral density; fracture risk; older men

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. National Institute on Aging (NIA)
  3. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
  4. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
  5. NIH Roadmap for Medical Research [R01 AG066671, U01 AG027810, U01 AG042124, U01 AG042139, U01 AG042140, U01 AG042143, U01 AG042145, U01 AG042168, U01 AR066160, UL1 TR000128]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the impact of a second bone mineral density (BMD) screening 7 years after the initial screening on fracture prediction in older men. The results showed that repeating the BMD screening did not significantly improve fracture prediction in community-dwelling older men.
Context Whether repeated bone mineral density (BMD) screening improves fracture prediction in men is uncertain. Objective We evaluated whether a second BMD 7 years after the initial BMD improves fracture prediction in older men. Methods Among 3651 community-dwelling men (mean age 79.1 years) with total hip BMD at baseline and Year 7 (Y7), self-reported fractures after Y7 were confirmed by radiographic reports. Fracture prediction assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression and logistic regression with receiver operating characteristic curves for models based on initial BMD, BMD change, and the combination of initial BMD and BMD change (combination model). Results During an average follow-up of 8.2 years after Y7, 793 men experienced >= 1 clinical fractures, including 426 men with major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) and 193 men with hip fractures. Both initial BMD and BMD change were associated with risk of fracture outcomes independent of each other, but the association was stronger for initial BMD. For example, the multivariable hazard ratio of MOF in the combination model per 1 SD decrement in BMD was 1.76 (95% CI 1.57-1.98) for initial BMD and 1.19 (95% CI 1.08-1.32) for BMD change. Discrimination of fracture outcomes with initial BMD models was somewhat better than with BMD change models and similar to combination models (AUC value for MOF 0.68 [95% CI 0.66-0.71] for initial BMD model, 0.63 [95% CI 0.61-0.66] for BMD change model, and 0.69 [95% CI 0.66-0.71] for combination model). Conclusion Repeating BMD after 7 years did not meaningfully improve fracture prediction at the population level in community-dwelling older men.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available