4.4 Article

VIDA: A Voxel-Based Dosimetry Method for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy Using Geant4

Journal

CANCER BIOTHERAPY AND RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 16-26

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2014.1713

Keywords

Monte Carlo; radioimmunotherapy; patient-specific dosimetry; SPECT/CT; 3D dosimetry

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, United States Department of Health and Human Services [R01 EB001994, P50 CA098131, P30 CA068485]
  2. AUR_CE Radiology Research Academic Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have developed the Voxel-Based Internal Dosimetry Application (VIDA) to provide patient-specific dosimetry in targeted radionuclide therapy performing Monte Carlo simulations of radiation transport with the Geant4 toolkit. The code generates voxel-level dose rate maps using anatomical and physiological data taken from individual patients. Voxel level dose rate curves are then fit and integrated to yield a spatial map of radiation absorbed dose. In this article, we present validation studies using established dosimetry results, including self-dose factors (DFs) from the OLINDA/EXM program for uniform activity in unit density spheres and organ self- and cross-organ DFs in the Radiation Dose Assessment Resource (RADAR) reference adult phantom. The comparison with reference data demonstrated agreement within 5% for self-DFs to spheres and reference phantom source organs for four common radionuclides used in targeted therapy (I-131, Y-90, In-111, Lu-177). Agreement within 9% was achieved for cross-organ DFs. We also present dose estimates to normal tissues and tumors from studies of two non-Hodgkin Lymphoma patients treated by I-131 radioimmunotherapy, with comparison to results generated independently with another dosimetry code. A relative difference of 12% or less was found between methods for mean absorbed tumor doses accounting for tumor regression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available