4.7 Article

Exploring the green waste management problem in food supply chains: A circular economy context

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 351, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131355

Keywords

Food waste; Waste minimization; Sustainability; Best-worst method; Green and circular economy; Food supply chain

Funding

  1. Uttarakhand Science Edu-cation and Research Centre (USERC) , Dehra Dun, India [USERC/2019-20/602]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to address food waste issues in the Indian food supply chain and proposes prioritizing waste prevention at the earlier stages, with skills and training identified as the highest priority criteria.
Food waste management is a growing environmental and economic issue for a developing country like India. This exploratory paper aims to prioritize key practices as criteria for food supply chains that lead to food waste reduction to ensure green waste management. Twenty-five criteria from the existing literature and expert inputs were assessed to resolve food waste reduction issues in food supply chains, especially in the agricultural sectors. The study identifies and ranks the intensities of each of the listed criteria. In the study, the Best-Worst Method, a multi-criteria decision-making approach, is applied. According to the findings, waste prevention at the earlier stages of food supply chains is given more priority compared to food waste minimization and treatment at the later stages. Hence, the study concludes skill and training as the highest ranked criteria, followed by pro-tection and infrastructure. Further, the study infers that understanding the individual intensities of criteria within a food supply chain can affect waste generation at each level, having a significant impact on waste reduction. The data in this research was evaluated in the Indian context.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available