4.7 Review

Life cycle assessment as a guide for designing circular business models in the wood panel industry: A critical review

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 355, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131729

Keywords

Circular economy; Life cycle assessment; Circular business model; Circular bioeconomy; Wood panel industry

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [312285/2019-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study is to use life cycle assessment (LCA) to guide the design and implementation of circular business models (CBMs) in the wood panel industry towards cleaner production. The study identified existing circularity in some parts of the manufacturing stage of reconstituted wood panels and proposed CBMs to reduce impacts identified via LCA and fill the circular gaps left by existing practices.
The objective of the present study is to use life cycle assessment (LCA) to guide the design and implementation of circular business models (CBM) in the wood panel industry towards a cleaner production. Initially, searches in the literature were carried out to select articles on LCA of wood panels, to investigate the possible synergies between LCA and CBMs in the wood panel industry. Investigations of the production system of reconstituted wood panels, with regard to both the biological and technical cycles, allowed spotting signs of existing circularity in some parts of the manufacturing stage, such as the use of wastes for combustion and generation of energy, and the use of ash from combustion processes. In order to reduce impacts, identified via LCA, CBMs for the wood panel sector were proposed, seeking to reduce the impacts identified via LCA and fill the circular gaps left by existing practices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available