4.7 Article

SAMPL9 blind predictions using nonequilibrium alchemical approaches

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 156, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0086640

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, blind predictions for the binding of WP6 with ammonium/diammonium cationic guests in the ninth challenge of SAMPL are presented. The binding free energies were calculated using a virtual double system single box approach and compared with previous submissions. The results show acceptable performance with higher accuracy than previous challenges, indicating the reliability of nonequilibrium approaches for binding free energy calculations.
We present our blind predictions for the Statistical Assessment of the Modeling of Proteins and Ligands (SAMPL), ninth challenge, focusing on the binding of WP6 (carboxy-pillar[6]arene) with ammonium/diammonium cationic guests. Host-guest binding free energies have been calculated using the recently developed virtual double system single box approach, based on the enhanced sampling of the bound and unbound end-states followed by fast switching nonequilibrium alchemical simulations [M. Macchiagodena et al., J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16, 7160 (2020)]. As far as Pearson and Kendall coefficients are concerned, performances were acceptable and, in general, better than those we submitted for calixarenes, cucurbituril-like open cavitand, and beta-cyclodextrines in previous SAMPL host-guest challenges, confirming the reliability of nonequilibrium approaches for absolute binding free energy calculations. In comparison with previous submissions, we found a rather large mean signed error that we attribute to the way the finite charge correction was addressed through the assumption of a neutralizing background plasma. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available