4.7 Article

Hybrid quantum-classical simulations of magic angle spinning dynamic nuclear polarization in very large spin systems

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 156, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0086530

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Science and Engineering Division
  2. DOE [DE-AC02-07CH11358]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a hybrid model using ab initio simulations to predict the correlation of dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) enhancements by treating nuclear spin diffusion, and applied it to core-shell metal-organic-framework nanoparticles, revealing new insights into the composition of the particles' shells.
Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance can be enhanced using unpaired electron spins with a method known as dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP). Fundamentally, DNP involves ensembles of thousands of spins, a scale that is difficult to match computationally. This scale prevents us from gaining a complete understanding of the spin dynamics and applying simulations to design sample formulations. We recently developed an ab initio model capable of calculating DNP enhancements in systems of up to similar to 1000 nuclei; however, this scale is insufficient to accurately simulate the dependence of DNP enhancements on radical concentration or magic angle spinning (MAS) frequency. We build on this work by using ab initio simulations to train a hybrid model that makes use of a rate matrix to treat nuclear spin diffusion. We show that this model can reproduce the MAS rate and concentration dependence of DNP enhancements and build-up time constants. We then apply it to predict the DNP enhancements in core-shell metal-organic-framework nanoparticles and reveal new insights into the composition of the particles' shells. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available