4.7 Article

The atomistic modeling of light-harvesting complexes from the physical models to the computational protocol

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 156, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0086275

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council [ERC-AdG-786714]
  2. [LIFETimeS]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article provides an overview of the major theoretical and computational breakthroughs achieved so far in the atomistic modeling of light-harvesting complexes, with a particular focus on the important role played by the protein and its dynamics. The article also discusses the unresolved issues in accurate modeling.
The function of light-harvesting complexes is determined by a complex network of dynamic interactions among all the different components: the aggregate of pigments, the protein, and the surrounding environment. Complete and reliable predictions on these types of composite systems can be only achieved with an atomistic description. In the last few decades, there have been important advances in the atomistic modeling of light-harvesting complexes. These advances have involved both the completeness of the physical models and the accuracy and effectiveness of the computational protocols. In this Perspective, we present an overview of the main theoretical and computational breakthroughs attained so far in the field, with particular focus on the important role played by the protein and its dynamics. We then discuss the open problems in their accurate modeling that still need to be addressed. To illustrate an effective computational workflow for the modeling of light harvesting complexes, we take as an example the plant antenna complex CP29 and its H111N mutant. (c) 2022 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).2022 Author(s).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available