4.7 Article

Graph Convolutional Network-Based Screening Strategy for Rapid Identification of SARS-CoV-2 Cell-Entry Inhibitors

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING
Volume 62, Issue 8, Pages 1988-1997

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00222

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive & Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a GCN-based virtual screening workflow that can rapidly identify new small molecule inhibitors against validated drug targets by training the model using information from experimentally identified HSPG and actin inhibitors.
The cell entry of SARS-CoV-2 has emerged as an attractive drug development target. We previously reported that the entry of SARS-CoV-2 depends on the cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) and the cortex actin, which can be targeted by therapeutic agents identified by conventional drug repurposing screens. However, this drug identification strategy requires laborious library screening, which is time consuming, and often limited number of compounds can be screened. As an alternative approach, we developed and trained a graph convolutional network (GCN)-based classification model using information extracted from experimentally identified HSPG and actin inhibitors. This method allowed us to virtually screen 170,000 compounds, resulting in similar to 2000 potential hits. A hit confirmation assay with the uptake of a fluorescently labeled HSPG cargo further shortlisted 256 active compounds. Among them, 16 compounds had modest to strong inhibitory activities against the entry of SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped particles into Vero E6 cells. These results establish a GCN-based virtual screen workflow for rapid identification of new small molecule inhibitors against validated drug targets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available