4.2 Article

Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine for Neuromuscular Block Reversal and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Resection of Lung Cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA
Volume 36, Issue 9, Pages 3626-3633

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.03.033

Keywords

Sugammadex; Neostigmine; Lung cancer resection; Neuromuscular block; Muscle relaxation

Funding

  1. Taizhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau [1901ky20, 20ywa15]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the effects of sugammadex and neostigmine on the reversal of neuromuscular block and the incidence of post-operative pulmonary complications in lung cancer resection patients. The results showed that sugammadex provided faster recovery of neuromuscular block and reduced the incidence of postoperative lung complications and duration of hospital stay.
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effect of sugammadex and neostigmine on neuromuscular block reversal and the incidence of post-operative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing lung cancer resection. Design: A double-blind, randomized, prospective study. Setting: A single major urban teaching and university hospital. Participants: One hundred adult patients underwent elective radical resection of lung cancer under general anesthesia. Interventions: Patients were assigned into neostigmine (0.05 mg/kg) + atropine 0.02 mg/kg group and sugammadex (2 mg/kg) group. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcomes were the incidence of any postoperative pulmonary complications, and the time to achieve 90% of train-of-four (TOF) after the administration of sugammadex or neostigmine. The secondary endpoints were the number of patients with TOF ratio (TOFr) <0.9 at the time of tracheal extubation, the incidence of readmission 30 days after discharge, and specific postoperative pulmonary complications. Results showed that the average time of recovery to TOFr >= 0.9 with sugammadex was 164.5 +/- 27.7 seconds versus 562.9 +/- 59.7 seconds with neostigmine + atropine treatment. Fewer sugammadex-treated patients did not achieve TOFr of 0.9 at the time of tracheal extubation than did neostigmine-treated participants. Patients in the sugammadex group had lower incidence of postoperative lung complications, and shorter durations of postanesthesia care unit stay and postoperative hospital stay than those in the neostigmine group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of readmission between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Administration of sugammadex provided faster recovery of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block when compared with neo-stigmine. Moreover, for patients undergoing lung cancer resection, administration of sugammadex could reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications and duration of postoperative hospital stay. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available