4.6 Article

Feasibility of Raman spectroscopy as a potential in vivo tool to screen for pre-diabetes and diabetes

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOPHOTONICS
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jbio.202200055

Keywords

diabetes; machine learning; principal component analysis; Raman spectroscopy; support vector machine

Funding

  1. Catedras CONACYT program [528]
  2. CONACYT [304501, 2016-291061]
  3. IDTI scholarship from COPOCYT
  4. CONACYT
  5. National Labs program through LANCYTT
  6. Terahertz Science and Technology National Lab
  7. Mantenimiento de Infraestructura Cientifica en Laboratorios Nacionales [2020-314931, 2021-315911]
  8. Frontier Science project [20884]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the feasibility of using Raman spectroscopy and multivariate analysis to noninvasively screen for prediabetes and diabetes. The results suggest that Raman spectroscopy can be used to classify prediabetes and diabetes with high accuracy.
In this article, we investigated the feasibility of using Raman spectroscopy and multivariate analysis method to noninvasively screen for prediabetes and diabetes in vivo. Raman measurements were performed on the skin from 56 patients with diabetes, 19 prediabetic patients and 32 healthy volunteers. These spectra were collected along with reference values provided by the standard glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) assay. A multiclass principal component analysis and support vector machine (PCA-SVM) model was created from the labeled Raman spectra and was validated through a two-layer cross-validation scheme. Classification accuracy of the model was 94.3% with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve AUC of 0.76 (0.65-0.84) for the prediabetic group, 0.86 (0.71-0.93) for the diabetic group and 0.97(0.93-0.99) for the control group. Our results suggest the feasibility of using Raman spectroscopy for the classification of prediabetes and diabetes in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available