4.4 Review

Design of chemically defined synthetic substrate surfaces for the in vitro maintenance of human pluripotent stem cells: A review

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.35034

Keywords

chemically defined; human pluripotent stem cells; peptide; synthetic surface; three-dimensional culture

Funding

  1. Chengguan District Science and Technology Project [2018-7-6]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [lzujbkj-2019-ct07, lzujbky-2021-ey14, lzujbky2021-kb05]
  3. Gansu Provincial Natural Science Foundation [20JR5RA253]
  4. Lanzhou University Hospital of Stomatology Research Support Fund [LZUKQKY-2019-Y10, lzukqky-2019-t9]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81801855]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review summarizes the design and limitations of reported synthetic substrates for cell culture, focusing on the development of promising peptide displaying surfaces and the biophysical regulation of synthetic substrate surfaces as well as three-dimensional culture systems.
Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) have the potential of long-term self-renewal and differentiation into nearly all cell types in vitro. Prior to the downstream applications, the design of chemically defined synthetic substrates for the large-scale proliferation of quality-controlled hPSCs is critical. Although great achievements have been made, Matrigel and recombinant proteins are still widely used in the fundamental research and clinical applications. Therefore, much effort is still needed to improve the performance of synthetic substrates in the culture of hPSCs, realizing their commercial applications. In this review, we summarized the design of reported synthetic substrates and especially their limitations in terms of cell culture. Moreover, much attention was paid to the development of promising peptide displaying surfaces. Besides, the biophysical regulation of synthetic substrate surfaces as well as the three-dimensional culture systems were described.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available