Journal
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 135, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111028
Keywords
Extremity trauma; Limb loss; Finite element model; Gait; Biomechanics
Categories
Funding
- Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs [W81XWH-14-2-0144]
- U.S. Department of Energy
- DoD
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigated trunk and pelvis kinematics, muscle forces, and resultant spinal loads in individuals with lower limb amputation (LLA), with and without chronic low back pain (LBP). The findings suggest that there are differences in trunk and pelvis kinematics between individuals with and without chronic LBP, but trunk muscle forces and spinal loads are similar regardless of LBP presence. These findings are important for understanding chronic LBP in individuals with LLA.
Persons with lower limb amputation (LLA) are at high risk for developing chronic low back pain (LBP), often with biomechanical factors considered as likely contributors. Here, trunk and pelvis kinematics, muscle forces, and resultant spinal loads were characterized in persons with LLA, with and without chronic LBP. Thirty-five persons with unilateral LLA - 19 with chronic LBP ( LLA-cLBP ), 16 without LBP ( LLA-nLBP ) - and 15 (uninjured) persons without LBP ( CTR-nLBP ) walked overground (1.3 m/s) while thorax and pelvis kinematics were tracked (and ranges of motion [ROM] computed), and used as inputs for a non-linear finite element model of the spine to estimate global and local muscle forces, and resultant spinal loads. In the frontal and transverse planes, thorax ROM were up to 66.6% smaller in LLA-nLBP versus LLA-cLBP (P < 0.001) and CTR-nLBP (P < 0.001). In the sagittal plane, pelvis ROM was 50.4% smaller in LLA-nLBP versus LLA-cLBP (P = 0.014). LLA-cLBP exhibited 45.5% and 34.2% greater peak local and global muscle forces, respectively, versus CTR-nLBP (P < 0.011). Up to 48.1% greater spinal loads were observed in LLA-cLBP versus CTR-nLBP (P < 0.013); peak compression and local muscle forces were respectively 20.2% and 41.0% larger in LLA-nLBP versus CTR-nLBP (P < 0.005). Despite differences in trunk and pelvis kinematics between LLA-cLBP and LLA-nLBP, trunk muscle forces and spinal loads were similar (P > 0.101) between these groups. Similar loading parameters regardless of LBP presence, while highly dependent on trunk muscle activation strategies, may mitigate further accumulation of mechanical fatigue. It remains important to understand the temporality of loading with respect to LBP onset following LLA.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available