4.5 Article

Achilles tendon mechanical properties during walking and running are underestimated when its curvature is not accounted for

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 137, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111095

Keywords

Mechanical power; Tendon force; Ankle range of motion; Walking; Running

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanical properties of the Achilles tendon (AT) can be estimated using different approaches. This study compared a straight-line method with a curvilinear method and found that the choice of method significantly affected the measured parameters. The curvilinear method resulted in lower internal moment arm and higher tendon length, leading to higher estimates of force and power. Neglecting the AT curvature could result in underestimation of these properties.
Achilles tendon (AT) mechanical properties can be estimated using an inverse dynamic approach, taking into account the tendon internal moment arm (IMA) and its kinematic behavior. Although AT presents a curvilinear line of action, a straight-line function to estimate IMA and AT length is often utilized in the literature. In this study, we combined kinetic, kinematic and ultrasound data to understand the impact of two different approaches (straight-line vs. curvilinear) in determining AT mechanical properties in vivo (during walking and running at the self-selected speed). AT force and power were calculated based on data of AT IMA and AT length derived by both respective methods. All investigated parameters were significantly affected by the method utilized (paired t-test; p < 0.05): when using the curvilinear method IMA was about 5% lower and AT length about 1.2% higher, whereas peak and mean values of AT force and power were 5% higher when compared to the straight-line method (both in walking and running). Statistic-parametric mapping (SMP) analysis revealed significant differences in IMA during the early and the late stance phase of walking and during the late stance phase of running (p < 0.01); SPM revealed significant differences also in AT length during the entire stance phase in both locomotion modes (p < 0.01). These results confirm and extend previous findings to human locomotion: neglecting the AT curvature might be a source of error, resulting in underestimates not only of internal moment arm and tendon length, but also of tendon force and power.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available