4.4 Article

Effect of A23187 ionophore treatment on human blastocyst development-a sibling oocyte study

Journal

JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 1225-1232

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02467-3

Keywords

Assisted oocyte activation; A23187 ionophore; CultActive; Blastocyst development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study results indicate that the use of CultActive does not improve embryo development outcomes in patients with a history of embryo developmental problems.
Purpose To investigate whether treatment with commercially available ready-to-use A23187 ionophore (GM508-CultActive) improves embryo development outcome in patients with a history of embryo developmental problems. Methods This is a uni-center prospective study in which sibling oocytes of patients with embryos of poor quality on day 5 in the previous cycle were treated or not with CultActive. Results Two hundred forty-seven metaphase II (MII) oocytes from 19 cycles performed between 2016 and 2019 were included in the study. After ICSI, the sibling oocytes were assigned to the treatment group or to the control group, following an electronically generated randomization list. A number of 122 MII were treated with CultActive and 125 MII had no treatment and were assigned to the control group. No difference in fertilization rate (p = 0.255) or in the capacity of embryos to reach good quality on day 5 (p = 0.197) was observed between the two groups. The utilization rates defined as the number of embryos transferred or cryopreserved per mature oocyte (p = 0.438) or per fertilized oocytes (p = 0.299) were not significantly different between the treated group and the control group. Conclusion The results of the current study do not support the use of CultActive in cases with embryo developmental problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available