4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: Motion During Total Knee Cementing Significantly Decreases Tibial Implant Fixation Strength

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages S12-S18

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.091

Keywords

aseptic tibial loosening; tibial debonding; and lipid contamination; cement debonding; aseptic failure; tibial fixation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite advancements in technique and devices, aseptic tibial loosening following primary total knee arthroplasty remains a problem. This study found that knee movement during cement polymerization significantly decreases tibial implant fixation strength. There were also variations in pull-out strength among different implant designs.
Background: Aseptic tibial loosening following primary total knee arthroplasty persists despite technique and device-related advancements. The mechanisms for this mode of failure are not well understood. We hypothesized that knee movement while the cement was curing dispersed lipids at the implant-cement interface and would result in decreased tibial fixation strength. Methods: A cadaveric study was performed utilizing 32 torso-to-toe specimens (64 knees). Four contemporary total knee arthroplasty designs were evaluated. Each implant design was randomly assigned to a cadaveric specimen pair with side-to-side randomization. Specimen densitometry was recorded. Each tibial implant was cemented using a standard technique. On one side, the tibial component was held without motion following impaction until complete cement polymerization. The contralateral knee tibial implantwas taken through gentle range of motion and stability assessment 7 minutes after cement mixing. Axial tibial pull-out strength and interface failure examination was performed on each specimen. Results: The average pull-out strength for the no motion cohort (5,462 N) exceeded the motion cohort (4,473 N) (P =.001). The mean pull-out strength between implant designs in the no motion cohort varied significantly (implant A: 7,230 N, B: 5,806 N, C: 5,325 N, D 3,486 N; P =.007). Similarly, the motion cohort inter-implant variance was significant (P <=.001). Intra-implant pull-out strength was significantly higher in implant A than D. The average pull-out strength was significantly lower in specimens that failed at the implant-cement interface vs bone failures (4,089 +/- 2,158 N vs 5,960 +/- 2,010 N, P <.0025). Conclusion: Knee motion during cement polymerization is associated with significant decreases in tibial implant fixational strength. Reduction in implant pull-out strength was identified with each implant design with motion and varied between designs. Across all tested designs, we recommend limiting motion while cementing the tibial implant to improve fixation strength. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available