4.6 Article

Can We Predict Fracture When Using a Short Cementless Femoral Stem in the Anterior Approach?

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY
Volume 37, Issue 8, Pages S901-S907

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.054

Keywords

anterior approach; fracture; periprosthetic; short stem; arthroplasty

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of patient-specific femoral and pelvic morphology and surgical technique on the perioperative fracture risk in short cementless stem total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the anterior approach (AA). The results showed that specific anatomical parameters can serve as predictors of fracture risk, highlighting the importance of careful selection of stem type.
Background: Short cementless femoral stems may allow for easier insertion with less dissection. The use of short stems with the anterior approach (AA) may be associated with a considerable perioperative fracture risk. Our aim was to evaluate whether patient-specific femoral and pelvic morphology and surgical technique, influence the perioperative fracture risk. Furthermore, we sought to describe important anatomical thresholds alerting surgeons. Methods: A single-center, multi-surgeon retrospective, case-control matched study was performed. Thirty nine periprosthetic fractures (3.4%) in 1,145 primary AA THAs using short cementless stems were identified. These were matched with 78 THA nonfracture controls for factors known to increase the fracture risk. A radiographic analysis using validated software measured femoral (canal flare index [CFI], morphological cortical index [MCI], and calcar-calcar ratio [CCR]) and pelvic (Ilium-ischial ratio [IIR], ilium overhang, and anterior superior iliac spine [ASIS] to greater trochanter distance) morphologies and surgical techniques (% canal fill). A multivariate and Receiver-Operator Curve (ROC) analysis was used to identify fracture predictors. Results: CFI (3.7 +/- 0.6 vs 2.9 +/- 0.4, P <.001) and CCR (0.5 +/- 0.1 vs 0.4 +/- 0.1, P = .006) differed. The mean IIR was higher in fracture cases (3.3 +/- 0.6 vs 3.0 +/- 0.5, P < .001). Percent canal fill was reduced in fracture cases (82.8 +/- 7.6 vs 86.7 +/- 6.8, P = .007). Multivariate and ROC analyses revealed a threshold CFI of 3.17 which was predictive of fracture (sensitivity: 84.6%/specificity: 75.6%). The fracture risk was 29 times higher when patients had CFI >3.17 and II ratio >3 (OR: 29.2 95% CI: 9.5-89.9, P <.001). Conclusion: Patient-specific anatomical parameters are important predictors of a fracture-risk. A careful radiographic analysis would help identify those at a risk of early fracture using short stems, and alternative stem options should be considered. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available