4.6 Article

Effect of graphite nanoplatelets surface area on mechanical properties of room-temperature vulcanized silicone rubber nanocomposites

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 139, Issue 27, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.52503

Keywords

mechanical properties; microscopy; morphology

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Education, Republic of Korea [2017R1D1A3B03031732, BK21 PLUS4 2020]
  2. Ministry of Education, Republic of Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graphite nanoplatelet (GNP) flakes with different surface area were analyzed for their impact on the properties of room-temperature vulcanized silicone rubber (RTV-SR) nanocomposites. The results showed that GNP flakes with larger surface area enhanced the mechanical performance of the nanocomposites.
Graphite nanoplatelet (GNP) flakes have attracted attention for the production of polymeric nanocomposites owing to their excellent mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties. In this work, the impact of three grades of GNP flakes with different surface area on the properties of room-temperature vulcanized silicone rubber (RTV-SR) nanocomposites was analyzed. The surface area was determined by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method using N-2 adsorption isotherms. The BET analysis showed that the GNP grades had BET surface areas of 422, 295, and 123 m(2)/g. Nanocomposites based on the three grades of GNP flakes with different surface area and RTV-SR were prepared using the solution-casting process. Mechanical analysis of the samples showed that the compressive modulus increased from 3.8 MPa (0 phr) to 4.4, 4.34, and 5.26 MPa at the filler loading of 15 phr of GNPs with 422, 295, and 123 m(2)/g, respectively. In addition, the fracture strain of the nanocomposites increased from 116% (0 phr) to 228%, 198%, and 151% in the samples with 422, 295, and 123 m(2)/g, respectively, at the filler loading of 15 phr GNP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available