4.6 Article

Modeling temperature, frequency, and strain effects on the linear electro-optic coefficients of ferroelectric oxides

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 131, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0090072

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Army Research Office [W911NF-21-1-0327]
  2. ARO [W911NF-19-1-0137]
  3. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DMR-2122071]
  4. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-16-1-0335]
  5. NSF [DMR-1806147, DMR-2122070, DMR-1931610, ACI-1548562]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a method for calculating the electro-optic coefficients of ferroelectric materials and applies it to study the electro-optic constants of BaTiO3, LiNbO3, and LiTaO3. The predicted constants agree with experimental results and provide benchmarks for experimental verification.
An electro-optic modulator offers the function of modulating the propagation of light in a material with an electric field and enables a seamless connection between electronics-based computing and photonics-based communication. The search for materials with large electro-optic coefficients and low optical loss is critical to increase the efficiency and minimize the size of electro-optic devices. We present a semi-empirical method to compute the electro-optic coefficients of ferroelectric materials by combining first-principles density-functional theory calculations with Landau-Devonshire phenomenological modeling. We apply the method to study the electro-optic constants, also called Pockels coefficients, of three paradigmatic ferroelectric oxides: BaTiO3, LiNbO3, and LiTaO3. We present their temperature-, frequency-, and strain-dependent electro-optic tensors calculated using our method. The predicted electro-optic constants agree with the experimental results, where available, and provide benchmarks for experimental verification. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available