4.6 Article

Diamond formation in double-shocked epoxy to 150 GPa

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 131, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0082237

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0003856]
  2. University of Rochester
  3. New York State Energy Research and Development Authority
  4. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) under LLNL's Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program [18-SI-004]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  6. agency of the U.S. Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present measurements of diamond formation in doubly shocked epoxy and find that diamond can precipitate not only from carbon and hydrogen-based polymers but also from polymers with the addition of oxygen, nitrogen, and chlorine.
We present measurements of diamond formation in doubly shocked Stycast 1266 epoxy (comprising C, H, Cl, N, and O) using in situ x-ray diffraction. Epoxy samples were reshocked against a LiF window to pressures between 80 and 148 GPa in experiments at the Omega Laser Facility. The pressure and temperature conditions were diagnosed in situ using velocimetry and optical pyrometry, respectively. X-ray diffraction patterns of the compressed epoxy are consistent with cubic diamond (Fd 3 over bar m), indicating that diamond can precipitate not only from twice-shocked CH polystyrene [Kraus et al. Nat. Astron. 1, 606 (2017)] at these conditions but also from twice-shocked CH polymers with the addition of oxygen, nitrogen, and chlorine. These results, in combination with previous works on CH, CH 2, CH 4, and methane hydrate, support that diamond often, but not always, forms from CH-based compounds at extreme pressures and temperatures, indicating that the chemical composition, thermodynamic compression path, and kinetics play an important role.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available