4.6 Article

Evaluating hop extract concentrations found in commercial beer to inhibit Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 133, Issue 3, Pages 1333-1340

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jam.15632

Keywords

biofilms; dental caries; hops; Streptococcus mutans; alpha-acids; beta-acids

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the effects of hop extracts with different beta-acid concentrations on Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation. The results showed that hop extracts similar to those found in commercial beer products can decrease S. mutans biofilm formation.
Aims: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of hop extracts with diverse beta-acid concentrations on Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation. Methods and Results: Ten different hop extracts, with a-acid concentrations similar to those found in commercial beer products and beta-acid concentrations ranging from 2.6 to 8.1%, were added to distilled water to make standardized concentrations. S. mutans isolates were treated with hop extract dilutions varying from 1:2 to 1:256. The minimum inhibitory, minimum bactericidal and minimum biofilm inhibitory concentrations were determined and the optical density was evaluated. Live/dead staining confirmed the bactericidal effects. Biofilm formation of several strains of S. mutans was significantly inhibited by hop extract dilutions of 1:2, 1:4, 1:8, 1:16 and 1:32. Strong negative correlations were observed between alpha- and beta-acid concentrations of the hop extracts and S. mutans total growth and biofilm formation. Conclusions: The use of hop extracts prepared similarly to commercial beer decreased S. mutans biofilm formation. Significance and Impact of the Study: The inclusion of hops in the commercial beer products may provide beneficial health effects. Further studies arc warranted to determine an effect in vivo on the development of dental caries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available