4.7 Article

Enteric methane emissions, growth, and carcass characteristics of feedlot steers fed a garlic- and citrus-based feed additive in diets with three different forage concentrations

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
Volume 100, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac139

Keywords

beef; bitter orange flavonoid; feedlot; garlic; methane emissions

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Thailand Research Fund (TRF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that increasing forage concentration led to higher methane emissions, while Mootral supplementation reduced methane production in diets with 15% corn silage, and improved carcass leanness.
One hundred and forty-four Angus x Simmental steers were allotted by body weight (BW; 363 kg), breed composition, and farm origin to a 3 x 2 factorial arrangement of six treatments (4 pens per treatment) to determine the effect of Mootral (garlic + citrus extract; 0.25% of the diet dry matter [DM] vs. 0.0%) on methane (CH4) emissions, growth, and carcass characteristics of feedlot cattle. During the first 84 d, cattle were fed three different forage concentrations in the diet (15%, 41.5%, or 68% corn silage) with or without Mootral. From day 85 to slaughter, corn silage was included at 15% of the diet DM with or without Mootral. CH4 emissions were measured on day 42 to 46 and day 203 to 207. Data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS. Mootral did not affect CH4 emissions on days 42 to 46 (P >= 0.47), but there was a forage effect, where steers fed the 68% corn silage emitted more CH4 on a g/d (P = 0.05) and a g/kg of dry matter intake (DMI; P = 0.007) basis and tended (P = 0.07) to produce more CH4 on g/kg BW basis compared to steers fed the 15% corn silage diet. On day 203 to 207, steers fed Mootral emitted less (P <= 0.03) CH4 on a g/d, g/kg DMI, and g/kg BW basis compared to steers not fed Mootral. There was an interaction (P = 0.03) between forage concentration and Mootral for DMI from day 0 to 84, where Mootral decreased DMI of steers fed 15% corn silage but did not affect DMI of steers fed 41.5% or 68% corn silage. There were no effects (P >= 0.22) of forage concentration or Mootral on BW or average daily gain at any time, or on DMI from day 84 to slaughter and overall. However, overall calculated net energy for maintenance (NEm) and net energy for gain (NEg) tended to be greater for steers fed Mootral (P <= 0.10). Intake from day 0 to 84 was lower and gain:feed from day 0 to 84 and overall was greater (P = 0.04) for steers fed 68% compared to steers fed 41.5% corn silage. Calculated NEm and NEg from day 0 to 84 and overall were greater for steers fed 68% corn silage compared to steers fed 41.5% corn silage (P <= 0.03). Mootral tended to decrease (P <= 0.09) fat thickness and yield grade. In conclusion, increasing forage concentration increased CH4 emissions and Mootral decreased CH4 production in 15% corn silage diets and tended to improve carcass leanness. Lay Summary Methane (CH4) production from enteric fermentation in ruminant animals is a contributor to global CH4, which is a greenhouse gas. Mootral (Mootral SA, Rolle, Switzerland) is a feed supplement that contains garlic and bitter orange extracts that are known to inhibit methanogenic bacteria. The objective of the current study was to quantify CH4 production and determine growth, intake, and carcass characteristics of feedlot steers fed Mootral in diets with a low, medium, and high forage concentration. Our findings demonstrate that increasing forage concentration increased CH4 emissions and that Mootral decreased CH4 production in 15% corn silage diets and improved carcass leanness. Mootral could be used in commercial feedlots and other grain-feeding scenarios as an effective method to decrease CH4 emissions. Mootral, which contains garlic and bitter orange extract decreased methane emissions in feedlot steers fed high-grain diets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available