4.7 Article

Na+/Ag+ substitution induced birefringence enhancement from AgGaS2 to NaGaS2

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 896, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.163093

Keywords

Crystal Growth; Birefringence; Chalcogenides; Structure-property relationship

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52002398, 61835014, 51972336, 91622107, 51425206]
  2. Instrument Developing Project of CAS [GJJSTD20200007]
  3. High-level Talent Project of Xinjiang Autonomous Region [2020000039, 2019XS24]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study systematically investigated the structure-birefringence relationship between AgGaS2 (AGS) and NaGaS2 (NGS), finding that NGS has a larger birefringence than AGS, showing promising potential as an infrared birefringent material.
Birefringent materials are of great important as opto-electronic functional devices in solid laser system. Investigations on the design of new birefringent materials with large birefringence is meaningful. In this study, structure-birefringence relationship between AgGaS2 (AGS) and NaGaS2 (NGS) was systematically investigated. In the structures, the high ionic Na+ cations broke the three dimensional (3D) [GaS] network to 2D layers, which results in the regular packing of GaS4 tetrahedra and further the birefringence (similar to 0.09, nearly twice that of AGS at similar to 1064 nm). Meanwhile, the blue-shift of the UV cutoff edge to 307 nm and a wide band gap of 3.9 eV has been observed in NGS. The property characterizations were carried out using the as-grown NGS single crystal with a size of 4 x 4 x 0.3 mm(3) by high temperature flux method. The results indicate that NGS may be a promising IR birefringent material and the cation substitution-oriented design strategy could be used to regulate the structure and optical properties of materials. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available