4.5 Article

Weed management in a direct-seeded rice-ratoon rice cropping system

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE
Volume 160, Issue 1-2, Pages 66-75

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0021859622000168

Keywords

Economics; energy use efficiency; partial factor productivity; system productivity; weed control efficiency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the effect of weed management practices in the main crop on the growth, yield, and economics of the rice-ratoon rice cropping system. The results showed that weed infestation reduced crop productivity and energy use efficiency. However, all weed control practices improved system productivity and nutrient uptake.
A field study was conducted to evaluate the effect of weed management practices in the main crop on growth, yield and economics of rice- ratoon rice cropping system in two consecutive years i.e., 2014-15 and 2015-16. The result showed that Cyperus difformis was the most dominant weed in the main rice crop, whereas Ludwigia adscendes was the dominant weed in ratoon rice. In weed-free plots, the main crop recorded the highest productivity of 47.52 kg/ha/day, whereas the ratoon crop registered productivity of 37.70 kg/ha/day which was the 79.3% of the main crop productivity. In the weedy plot, crop-weed competition caused 28.8 and 37.5% reduction in energy use efficiency and energy productivity of the rice-ratoon rice cropping system respectively. Yield reduction of 37.3 and 43.6% in the main crop and ratoon crop respectively recorded due to weed infestation in weedy check. All the weed control practices registered an increase in system productivity, nutrient uptake and energy use efficiency. Among the herbicidal treatments, application of bensulfuron-methyl + pretilachlor (60 + 600 g/ha) at 10 DAS to the main crop registered a higher net return of USD$ 639.2 and 260.1 of main crop and ratoon crop, respectively. Hence it can be recommended for weed management in rice-ratoon rice cropping system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available