4.7 Article

Emotion-related impulsivity predicts increased anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 301, Issue -, Pages 289-299

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.01.037

Keywords

Emotion-related impulsivity; Urgency; Anxiety; Depression; Suicidal ideation; Stress reactivity; Covid-19 pandemic

Funding

  1. NIMH [R01MH 110477]
  2. University of California

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Emotion-related impulsivity is related to internalizing symptoms and predicts higher levels of depression, anxiety, general distress, and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact of emotion-related impulsivity on stress levels varies, with one form predicting internalizing symptoms at low stress levels and another form predicting internalizing symptoms at high stress levels.
Introduction: Emotion-related impulsivity, defined by poor constraint in the face of emotion, is related to internalizing symptoms, cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Internalizing symptoms, though, are profoundly tied to stress reactivity, and little is known about how emotion-related impulsivity relates to stress reactivity. Method: Taking advantage of a sample that had completed measures of depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, and two forms of emotion-related impulsivity before the pandemic, we asked participants to complete three weekly follow-up internalizing assessments early in the pandemic. Results: Among the 150 participants, pre-pandemic emotion-related impulsivity scores predicted higher depression, anxiety, general distress, and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Controlling for prepandemic scores, one form of emotion-related impulsivity (Feelings Trigger Action) predicted increased anxiety and general distress. We also examined how pre-pandemic emotion-related impulsivity was moderated by weekly COVID-related stress. One form of emotion-related impulsivity (Pervasive Influence of Feelings) predicted internalizing symptoms at low stress levels, and a different form (Feelings Trigger Action) predicted internalizing symptoms at higher stress levels. Limitations: Limitations include the small sample size, the absence of repeat measures of impulsivity, the attrition of individuals with more internalizing symptoms, and the reliance on self-rated measures. Conclusions: Forms of emotion-related impulsivity predict increases in anxiety and distress over time, but the interactions with stress levels appear to vary. Emotion-related impulsivity can be addressed with accessible intervention tools, suggesting the promise of broader screening for those at risk for internalizing symptoms during periods of high stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available